Transitional English 4D pilot — translated short D material

Archive status: translation/editorial pilot, 24 local questions

Download the exact Markdown source · SHA-256: 4b2db4c99356ec35631aa20cb30ff3a4e71221f9924f8c451dcc69e4b44d7f99

This is a portable description of the historical translation pilot, not the later complete operative 4D specification. Do not treat a translated answer as a fresh independent answer. The current long 4D protocol is a different, later scope with 72 questions per object–frame cell.

Identity and lineage

• Parent: Russian 0.3D short D slice, itself shortened from revised 0.2D.
• Historical designation: first described as an English 0.3D editorial translation and then renamed 4D by the operator.
• Scope: one Creation–Time local cell, 24 question/answer pairs, not all objects or all 62 frame points.
• Working language for the operative output: English. The original Russian evidence remains in its separate archive, not in the English output corpus.

Required inputs

Preserve the original Russian prompt and exact short-D source questions and answers in an evidence archive. Prepare a faithful English full prompt and 24 English question translations with stable parent IDs. Record whether each English answer is a translation/editorial adaptation or a newly generated isolated answer; in this pilot it was translation/editorial adaptation. Carry the whole prompt, not an isolated keyword.

Preparation

Use the already frozen document-derived semantic and seven-step Socratic preparation, the Creation/Destruction/Recreation/Lifecycle-management tetrad, temporal point 24, factual and counterfactual modes, and three variants per position/mode. Preserve the meaningful distinction between a static artifact and a continuing production capacity where the revised source requires it. The six English interrogative dimensions (how, what, why, when, where and for what purpose) belong within one child question; they do not multiply the question count.

Execution

1. Translate the full prompt and frozen 24-question register into English, preserving concept, operation, mode and child relation.
2. For historical corpus reproduction, translate the matching Russian short answer rather than claiming a new independent model call. Save original ID and translation link.
3. Aim for 273–304 Unicode characters per short answer as a soft first-pass target under the later correction. Keep any substantive out-of-range raw result; record the actual length and do not regenerate solely for length.
4. Save English-only operative question/answer Markdown, the English raw answer corpus, a readable English synthesis and a translation-fidelity audit.
5. A future fresh English-versus-Russian model comparison must freeze matched inputs and use separate answer calls, with actual model/effort/usage data. Such a later matched experiment must be labeled separately from this translation pilot.

Volume and stopping

4 positions × 2 modes × 3 children = 24 questions. Complete this historical pilot only after all 24 English question/answer translations and links exist. This does not establish the performance or total cost of the later 80,352-question planned full 4D run.

Source, preservation and uncertainty

Preserve the original Russian and English Q/A separately. Compare semantic coverage question by question; flag lost conditions, created certainty and changed scope. A linked literary synthesis may reorder the material but must preserve substantive distinctions and trace source-to-passage. Actual measured token saving or quality difference requires a distinct matched experiment. Historical evidence: 260927-GPT-03d-english-data-01.json, 260927-GPT-4d-english-data-01.json, 260927-GPT-4d-english-only-audit-01.json and 260928-GPT-3d4d-full-comparison-01.md in this project's GPT output. The later operative specification is 260928-GPT-4d-pipeline-english-04.md.

Minimal portable instruction

Given the exact Russian short-D corpus and this specification, produce the corresponding 24-pair English translation pilot, retaining IDs, full-prompt meaning, factual/counterfactual status, raw translations and fidelity audit. Do not call the result a new independent run or the completed full 4D cascade.

Exact 24-question English pilot register

1. 4D-EN-001 (factual, thesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should checks be made when recognizing the first result of creating one AI influencer?
2. 4D-EN-002 (factual, thesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should distinctions be made between the first material and a working procedure for continuing the character?
3. 4D-EN-003 (factual, thesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should records be kept when character components are prepared in different places and on different dates?
4. 4D-EN-004 (factual, antithesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should checks be made when recognizing cessation of a reproducible AI influencer character?
5. 4D-EN-005 (factual, antithesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should checks be made when an archive survives but the means of continuing the character is unavailable?
6. 4D-EN-006 (factual, antithesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should records be kept about one's own cessation when other participants retain the material?
7. 4D-EN-007 (factual, synthesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should checks be made when a new version appears while retaining the character's identity?
8. 4D-EN-008 (factual, synthesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should distinctions be made between replacing a production tool and changing the character's perceived identity?
9. 4D-EN-009 (factual, synthesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should checks be made when recreation is complete but the earlier version's activities continue?
10. 4D-EN-010 (factual, transcendence): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should checks be made when independent management of the character's lifecycle emerges?
11. 4D-EN-011 (factual, transcendence): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should distinctions be made between a decision to change the character's state and an executed transition?
12. 4D-EN-012 (factual, transcendence): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose should conditions be established for pausing and returning the character beyond a single creation date?
13. 4D-EN-013 (counterfactual, thesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would checks be made if character materials appeared before the account was established?
14. 4D-EN-014 (counterfactual, thesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would distinctions be made if a procedure were recorded early but usable material obtained later?
15. 4D-EN-015 (counterfactual, thesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would records be kept if the first result appeared before its readiness criteria were recorded?
16. 4D-EN-016 (counterfactual, antithesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would checks be made if the account disappeared while the means of reproducing the character remained?
17. 4D-EN-017 (counterfactual, antithesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would checks be made if one's own archive were lost while external copies of the character remained?
18. 4D-EN-018 (counterfactual, antithesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would clarification be needed if the means of continuation were restored late without replacing the character?
19. 4D-EN-019 (counterfactual, synthesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would records be kept if old and new implementations of the character operated simultaneously?
20. 4D-EN-020 (counterfactual, synthesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would checks be made if the old version ceased before the new version's suitability was confirmed?
21. 4D-EN-021 (counterfactual, synthesis): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would continuity be checked if the character kept its name but its role and offer changed?
22. 4D-EN-022 (counterfactual, transcendence): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would checks be made if work began with a transferred ready-made character instead of creation from scratch?
23. 4D-EN-023 (counterfactual, transcendence): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would checks be made if materials were transferred without a confirmed procedure for continuing the character?
24. 4D-EN-024 (counterfactual, transcendence): How, what, why, when, where and for what purpose would records be kept if responsibility changed without changes to materials or the perceived character?

Exact evidence links

• 260927-GPT-03d-data-02.json (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260927-GPT-03d-data-02.json) — SHA-256 de4e96a0c7a2879288bd96bdfe2adce7c022165643bfa634a8dbd9f29552becb.
• 260927-GPT-03d-english-data-01.json (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260927-GPT-03d-english-data-01.json) — SHA-256 044b9f93341faff30639b55904b9fc78e68d749241aebabc439c06c2cd2db188.
• 260927-GPT-4d-english-data-01.json (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260927-GPT-4d-english-data-01.json) — SHA-256 f68276981538f4bf48211f37df609ea3a0f0f92c702bc0b2be85ea78553ea50d.
• 260927-GPT-4d-english-only-audit-01.json (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260927-GPT-4d-english-only-audit-01.json) — SHA-256 9d927d604b283a1598c2d233e6a209bdd8494ad9a485ede3f4e0725fb3986f75.
• 260928-GPT-3d4d-full-comparison-01.md (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260928-GPT-3d4d-full-comparison-01.md) — SHA-256 5f9c5b3ea844254819308c933eda334e79fbcf81cb8823d96b2a5c3a1d518576.
• 260928-GPT-4d-pipeline-english-04.md (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260928-GPT-4d-pipeline-english-04.md) — SHA-256 4b13c10edfb929d9e64614ae322941dc931f13357dae4d5c1100f00792f59d3b.