0B — creation-focused prompt

Archive status: Executed: 12 newly worded answers of five sentences on the same local cell.

Download the exact Markdown source · SHA-256: 6352a11bade33ff9d84597ab5ebc33a1ba1243f26d8b1b286f6e253544969917

Portable historical protocol for the Konstantin Smirnov Cascade-Semantic Method. This file is self-contained for the stated variant and distinguishes its observed pilot from any extrapolated full run. Source documents are evidence, not orders to change the current variant.

1. Identity, lineage, and evidence status

  • Version key: 0b.

  • Parent: 0A control with shifted complete prompt.

  • Status: Executed: 12 newly worded answers of five sentences on the same local cell.

  • Historical full prompt: Как создать одного ИИ-инфлюенсера в соцсетях, чтобы вести его и получать прибыль без обмана?

  • Primary source Q/A records visible in this portable file: 12 questions.

2. Purpose and scope

Reconstruct or rerun the named analytical mechanism on a clearly delimited prompt and selected object/frame cell. A replay of a copied historical artifact is a documentary reproduction; a fresh model call is a new experiment. Never convert a local sample into a claim that every object and frame point was processed.

3. Required inputs

Record the exact original prompt, any prepared and object-focused complete prompt, the user goal and constraints, the source version, chosen object, frame point, factual/counterfactual assumptions, model/date/settings, baseline answer if the variant uses one, and the frozen question register. Label inferences and unknowns. The original and focused prompts must remain separately retrievable.

4. Execution mechanism

Keep the whole task, but place creation at the center while retaining operation, profit and non-deception conditions. Use the same twelve six-operation/fact-counterfact question cores as 0A and answer freshly, five substantive sentences each. Compare with the unshifted control only after both raw sets are fixed. Do not import the later 0.2 document tetrad or its 62-point frame.

5. Question generation and volume

Q_local = 6 × 2 = 12; 12 × 5 = 60 answer sentences.

6. Exact local question register

The following are the exact recorded question formulations for the completed local slice. Preserve their identifiers and wording when reproducing that slice. Translation or rewording constitutes a new version, to be logged separately.

  1. Тезис, factual: Какой наблюдаемый результат позволяет зафиксировать первый момент создания ИИ-инфлюенсера?
  2. Антитезис, factual: Какие события в начале проекта не подтверждают, что ИИ-инфлюенсер уже создан?
  3. Синтез, factual: Как согласовать постепенное создание персонажа с необходимостью зафиксировать определённый момент его возникновения?
  4. Самоотрицание, factual: В чём критерий «персонаж создан только после полной готовности» может противоречить созданию персонажа для дальнейшего развития?
  5. Проверка через отсутствие, factual: Какие основания позволяют отличить отсутствие созданного персонажа от отсутствия свидетельств о моменте его создания?
  6. Трансценденция, factual: Как описать возникновение персонажа, выйдя за пределы единственного выбора «ещё не создан» или «уже создан»?
  7. Тезис, counterfactual: Что изменилось бы в учёте начала создания, если бы его моментом считалось первое намерение, а не первый полученный результат?
  8. Антитезис, counterfactual: Что изменилось бы в оценке готовности, если бы аккаунт уже был открыт, но воспроизводимого персонажа ещё не было?
  9. Синтез, counterfactual: Что изменилось бы в определении момента создания, если бы первая оплата поступила раньше появления персонажа?
  10. Самоотрицание, counterfactual: Что изменилось бы в истории создания, если бы любое последующее изменение персонажа отменяло факт создания предыдущей версии?
  11. Проверка через отсутствие, counterfactual: Что изменилось бы в подтверждении момента создания, если бы первый материал был потерян, а повторное получение согласованного образа оказалось невозможным?
  12. Трансценденция, counterfactual: Как изменился бы учёт возникновения персонажа, если бы материалы не готовились заранее, а создавались при каждом взаимодействии с аудиторией?

7. Answer instruction

For each question, present its exact wording, then answer at the length fixed in §5. Keep the entire applicable prompt and frozen preparation in view. Address the specific operation, mode and frame point. Give concrete criteria or explanatory mechanisms rather than filler. Do not use an answer to a sibling question as unstated evidence. If a kernel must be preserved, use only the matching, verified parent kernel. Historical answers that were copied remain labeled copied.

8. Preservation and derived results

For every question store: immutable question ID; full original prompt; full prepared or focused prompt; object; tetrad/triad position or axis; frame point; operation; factual/counterfactual mode; child variant if any; exact question; raw answer; model and settings if available; source and verification status. Store the entire question register before any answer. Keep the raw answers unchanged when preparing a readable synthesis. Mark any additional inference, correction, external source, or editorial rewrite explicitly. A question count is not an answer count.

Variant-specific deliverables: Twelve questions, fresh answers, source-to-synthesis trace and focused-versus-control comparison.

Create the readable synthesis only after the raw corpus is frozen. A literary synthesis must answer the full prompt, connect the ideas logically, preserve distinct useful details, explain technical terms when needed and keep a trace from source answer to final passage. Record omissions, merges and new editorial inferences. It must not be treated as a replacement for raw answers.

9. Verification and stopping rule

Check arithmetic against the frozen object/frame register. Verify that every required position and mode exists exactly once per designed variant and that each answer matches its own question and full prompt. Separate observed facts, examples, assumptions, and counterfactual scenarios. Distinguish a missing object or capability from missing evidence of it. Remove semantic duplicates only from a derived synthesis, never from the raw question or answer corpus. Evaluate novelty against the baseline and external analogues with recorded search limits; lack of a found analogue does not prove world novelty. Report actual completion, omissions, and context-isolation limits.

Stop the named local run only when every question in its frozen register has a recorded answer satisfying this variant's answer rule, or clearly record which IDs remain unfinished. Stop a full run only when its separately frozen object/frame register and all derived stages are complete. Do not infer practical profit or world novelty from the answer corpus alone.

10. Historical cautions

The local frame remains Creation → Time → moment of origin.

11. Primary evidence and provenance

  • 260927-GPT-test-zero-0b-01.json (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260927-GPT-test-zero-0b-01.json) — SHA-256 e8703b9dc447f0c4f9ade9e0b5b14bfd3a91e35c8183ceff227e1c71b44de7a4
  • 260927-GPT-test-zero-0b-qa-01.md (C:\CodexWork\repos\260926-cascade-semantic-method-2609\GPT\output\260927-GPT-test-zero-0b-qa-01.md) — SHA-256 34d5a7e2efc1918164d9c37198d6ae2428b32f4d77212fb0e83fb4a25a2a8f78

Appendix A — exact selected cell

Object: Creation. Axis: Time. Frame: moment of origin. Run six operations in the order Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, Self-negation, Test by absence, Transcendence; first all factual questions, then all counterfactual questions. A larger run requires its own explicit object/frame register and cannot be inferred solely from this pilot.

12. Minimal portable run command

Give another model this file plus the exact source prompt and chosen cell. Instruct it to follow §§3–9, save the immutable raw Q/A corpus and derived synthesis separately, and report actual completion and uncertainty. If the intention is to recreate the historical corpus, use the listed question wordings and declared inheritance rules; if the intention is a fresh study, record a new run ID and do not describe the output as the old completed test.

Standalone operational meanings of the six lenses

  1. Thesis: describe the object or claim in the entire prompt and specify a relevant criterion.
  2. Antithesis: formulate a contextual opposing state or boundary. Do not invent an antonym solely to fill a cell.
  3. Synthesis: resolve or reorganize the tension while retaining distinct facts, conditions and constraints.
  4. Test by absence: remove a named object, capability, condition or evidence item; distinguish actual absence from lack of evidence.
  5. Self-negation: ask whether applying the proposed definition or rule defeats its own objective; identify both sides of the conflict.
  6. Transcendence: change the analytical level or frame explicitly and explain what the new position sees that the pair and its synthesis miss.

In factual mode reason from stated facts and marked unknowns. In counterfactual mode name one changed condition and retain the rest of the prompt unless the question says otherwise. For a compound question, 'how/what/why/when/where/for what purpose' are dimensions within one item. Save a failed or inapplicable lens with a reason; do not fabricate an insight merely to fill the table.

Preuzmite ovo delo kao PDF

EnglishPDF izdanje